Comments on: Peculiar People: Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses

By: Khf

Khf — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:42:00 +0000

M Pratt, I know your comment was made two years ago and you may never see this but I wanted to respond. No one is ever asked to “prove” that they are a full tithe payer. At the end of the year we are invited to attend tithing settlement with the bishop. We are given a printout for our own use that tallies the tithing we paid that year. The person can then use the tally as he or she sees fit to determine for themselves if they are full tithe payers or not. Then, in tithing settlement with the bishop, the person can declare that they are full tithe payers, and the bishop takes their word for it. No bank statements or other proof is ever wanted, asked for or expected. A person can lie, or tell the truth.

While the declaration is verbally to the bishop, most members know that it is really about your relationship with God, and God knows the thoughts and intents of our hearts. Thou shalt not lie is still a commandment, and to do so reaps it’s own consequences in our inner spiritual wellbeing. The church isn’t there to be the spiritual police and prove honesty. It is understood that if you believe in Christ, you will also be striving to be like Him and doing your personal best to keep his commandments. Trust is given, faithfulness and honesty assumed. And tithing is voluntary.

By: marissa z

marissa z — Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:39:35 +0000

Hi Clay. Just a few comments. I am a practicing member of the “Mormon” church and although I have been a member all of my life, I still to this day continue to study it and am always interested in how it differs from other religions. I came across this site as I was researching JW beliefs because a friend of mine is studying with the Witnesses and has started to avoid me and I wanted to know why. I believe I understand why now.

I agree that there does exist among the Mormons those that are elitist and snobby but that is not because we are ever taught to be that way. Unfortunately, snobbery exists among all religions, races, and creeds. It’s just ignorance.

I, as others have said, appreciate that you have focused on the similarities between the religions. I think that if we all spent more time seeing what we have in common rather that bashing eachother, we might be surprised. I have been to so many Catholic websites, among other religions, that actually invest a lot of time teaching their members to hate Mormons and more often than not, what they are teaching their people is not even correct. In my area, anti-Mormon classes are given within the other churches. That seems so sad to me. I have never been taught to shun or avoid anyone of any other faith. On the contrary, I have been taught to love and serve them. In our humanitarian efforts, religion is never even a factor.

Thanks.

By: m pratt

m pratt — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:06:51 +0000

I was born a Catholic and at the age of 5 my parents converted to Jehovah’s Witnesses. They made me write a letter to the Catholic church that I was to be taken off of their records as a member. That was the beginning of my memory of a life of confusion, stictness and isolation. I grew in the JW faith watching others and myself being rediculed for being different when not allowed to solute the flag, or sing in the christman choir.
I went preaching from door to door on every saturday covering blocks of territory preaching “the good news of Gods Kingdom “at the tender age of 7. I remember never being allowed to play with the neighbor kids because they were “bad association”.
Our parents tried so hard to please “Jehovah” my mom often turning my father into the elders because he started smoking or drinking on heavy levels, he was “disfellowshipped” 3 times which is equivelent to ex-communication. We suffered the shame as a family because our dad had to sit in the back row and others could not speak to him and the other children who had fathers as “elders” in good standing teased and rediculed my bropther and i.
Yet in retrospect, I see that it was all my mothers doing for tattling.
As I grew up to the age of 12 my father dies and my mother left the JW faith and turned to immorality. She seemed to have lost hope without my dad.
I wa shuffled around from one family member to another, some of the faith…some not.
Eventually after marriage I had a son at the age of 22 and decided to rejoin and I became a baptized member. I had difficulty for the consentration of my JW religion took its toll on my marriage. My husband felt neglected because I was preaching and attending meetings against his will. He eventually left me homeless with 2 children and the JW’s stood by and offered no help, but only council that I could turn to churches and other facilities for free food.
I was inactive for many years and resumed my activity in a different state. I found the congregations there were nicer and more helpful and that it was not the religion that were un helpful but it was the certain people within the congregation.
I was then an active JW but single and the elders grilled me if at during the time of inactivity di I have any sexual relations outside of a marriage that I was not remoursful over? If there were any chance I would return to the bad lifestyle then I needed to be disfellowshipped. I answered “No”
But, I struggled so hard as a single person and being alone, and sitting at the end of the row as a head to my family, that the struggle was a daily one.
So eventually, I became inactive again and moved to another state and to this day I am still the same.
Why I am here is that finally I have met someone and he is a disfellowshipped mormon trying to return to his faith. I support his need to return because I was once there in his shoes trying to hard to reach God and the faith he chose to represent him. The struggle that I have is that I still dearly love the JW faith I was raised in despite my problems I experienced,
because of one thing…..a mormon has to give 10% of tithing show their bank financial statements to the mormon church to prove yourself and worthiness
and JW’s do not collect like that a JW donates what they can in a secretive collection box hidden way back in the room

By: Michael B

Michael B — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:42:34 +0000

“Jehovah’s Witnesses claim of increased membership is suspect.”

someone above wrote this, but isnt this the same claim about mormons. isnt there claims that they count people that left, people that dont go, people that they cant find are counted until like 108 or something like that. everyone in a house is counted as well i believe, but i dont know if JW’s and other religions count everyoe in the house, so arent those numbers false as well? does anyone know how many JW’s and Mormons there really are? i suppose not, no one likes to tell people they are losing members

It does look like both the JWs and Mormons are growing at similar rates. at least from my perspective, JWs say they are 6 million strong, mormons are 12 or 13 million strong, mormons founded in 1830 or something like that and JWs founded in 1930 or something like that, the mormons have about 100 years on the JWs, hence, twice as many members. for what is worth, how fast or how many members there are says nothing, big freakin deal.

By: CNJ

CNJ — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:36:58 +0000

I have a question, if someone converts into one religion, say mormonism, they die a mormon, right? Is the opposite also true, if someone converts out of mormonism, do they die what ever religion they were at the time, or do mormons believe they are always mormon regardless if they leave?

By: SA

SA — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:35:04 +0000

For that matter, when someone leaves the mormon chuch they can be shunned as well. I have seen many family members get virtually written off by active mormons because they left. I do not think it is appropriate to imply that “Catholics” or Jews only do this. That is arrogance.

By: MJH

MJH — Sun, 11 May 2008 18:25:50 +0000

#16 Clay-The “go in peace” comment could be true for non-practicing Jewish or Catholic families. Practicing Catholics and Jews generally do not allow peaceful exits. In my own family when a Catholic married a Mormon, the family priest told the Catholic family to not participate in the couple’s ceremony or have anything to do with the couple. Mormons had been listed as heretics in their literature and may be still. In South America, I met numerous Catholics who have left the Church and have suffered estrangement from their family and the Catholic community.

Of the Jewish converts to Mormonism that I know personally, half have been shunned by their adherent families who refuse to have any contact with their Mormon relations.

I think the “go in peace” religious exit happens among passive believing communities and families.
MJH

By: Bruce Nielson

Bruce Nielson — Sun, 11 May 2008 16:23:46 +0000

Norman,

No, the LDS church believes in the 144,000 also, but interprets it differently. Thus John Hamers comment was not about JWs. See http://scriptures.lds.org/en/dc/77/11#11 for info on the LDS view of the 144,000.

By: norman chapman

norman chapman — Sun, 11 May 2008 15:44:27 +0000

Hello,
I am researching Jacob Kimbel Chapman. On Feb. 18th a John Hamer wrote that he is among the 144,000. Does that mean that he converted to the Witnesses at some point? Is there anywhere that I can see documentation to this effect?
Thank you,
Norman Chapman

By: Viriatha

Viriatha — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 11:14:13 +0000

I think one reason JW’s lose people, and this was certainly a HUGE consideration for me when I married a gentleman raised as one, is that you’re not supposed to have friends with whom you socialize outside the congregation. One of the reasons they sometimes get labeled as a “cult” is because of that tendency to isolate members. (I think the word cult is thrown around far too often for the wrong reasons.)

If you have no good friends outside your Church, and for some reason you get “excommunicated”, you are truly isolated. (I put the word in quotes as it means very different things to different faiths.)

I like JW’s. I admire their willingness to do truly unpleasant things because they think God wants them to, a dedication not often found in other religions, but I think they went too far in their drive to see themselves as “The Chosen Ones”.

By: Danny Haszard

Danny Haszard — Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:10:20 +0000

Jehovah’s Witnesses have largest turnover of recruits,have one of the highest attrition rates of all denominations.

Reports all over the news wires from TIME Magazine-”"An even more extreme example of what might be called “masked churn” is the relatively tiny Jehovah’s Witnesses, with a turnover rate of about two-thirds.

That means that two-thirds of the people who told Pew they were raised Jehovah’s Witnesses no longer are — yet the group attracts roughly the same number of converts. Notes Lugo, “No wonder they have to keep on knocking on doors.”

Jehovah’s Witnesses claim of increased membership is suspect.
These reports are “SELF-REPORTING” stats tallied by the Watchtower society.They wouldn’t cook the books would they?

There actually are now twice as many former Jehovah’s Witnesses as there are active ones with thousands leaving every month.Baptisms at assemblies is often mostly family member children who have grown up JW.

Jehovah’s Witnesses are LOSING members and are on the decline.Japan has lost over 600 congregations.Witnesses are shrinking in number in many Western countries as of the last few years, as the Internet facilitates the spread of information (much of it critical of the Witnesses).

Jehovah’s Witnesses members are cautioned against creating JW-related websites, largely to prevent their members from discovering the history and dirty laundry of this organization on other websites. There are literally hundreds of former members pages in many languages
–
Danny Haszard Jehovah’s Witness X 33 years
http://www.freeminds.org

By: Travis W.

Travis W. — Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:54:14 +0000

Great Article, You are right there are many simularities between JW’s and LDS mebers. I know first hand. I was raised and spent 19 years attending meetings at the kindom Hall and my family is rooted strongly in that religion. I though, met and married a morman girl and 9 years later converted to mormanism. I find both religions to have strong moral values but the differance for me is that JW’s hold no hope for an after life if you are not a practicing member at Armgedon. I could not buy into this and don’t believe heavenly father could be as cruel as to only rember those of one religion.
Also, if you choose to leave the church after being baptised you will be alienated from your family. They do not believe in putting family first. I chose not to be baptised so I am still able to be a part of our family fuctions.
I hold no Ill will towards JW’s, For the most part they are good people.

By: Carlos U.

Carlos U. — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:09:17 +0000

I’ve always had a high oppinion of Jehova’s Witnesses. I don’t agree with their beliefs, but overall they are moral, good people. I studied with them casualy for a while (more like my mom would have them over) and learned a lot of basic Bible stories. In high school I had a few classmates who were JW and they were great kids and good friends.

By: Bryce Haymond

Bryce Haymond — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:50:51 +0000

Interesting post. Thanks for sharing.

I think it’s funny when we sometimes make fun of other religions, like the “Jay Dubs”, and then turn around and expect other people to respect us and are shocked when they ridicule us too. If we want respect, we must first give it, and always give it. We might follow the good advice of doing unto others what we would have them do unto us.

By: Clay Whipkey

Clay Whipkey — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:06:09 +0000

“This is the second time that I’ve seen comments in the bloggernacle suggesting that the Second Anointing is merely “rumor” or “myth.””

Nick, I was referring to the rumor of the Second Anointing still being practiced secretly. I’m using the term “rumor” only for lack of evidence corroborating it, for me personally. Calm down. ;-p

By: Brent Hartman

Brent Hartman — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:50:22 +0000

Nick,

The things that were once required for the highest degree of exaltation are no longer needed. Besides, women had to administer to men during the 2nd annointings, and it just wouldn’t be right to allow women today to administer to men. They might let the power go to their head.

By: Nick Literski

Nick Literski — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:07:31 +0000

While the Mormon view of this is that some people (Moses, Elijah, City of Enoch, Joseph Smith) can be guaranteed exaltation before their death, and there is a controversial rumor of a special temple ceremony that seals this on the lucky recipient as well, its not really a core principle doctrine for us.

This is the second time that I’ve seen comments in the bloggernacle suggesting that the Second Anointing is merely “rumor” or “myth.” Historical information on this ordinance is so readily available that I can’t understand intelligent people questioning its existence. Is this one of those cases where yet another BYU Religion Department instructor is teaching utter nonsense to students, in order to craft a new “truth” in the LDS church??

By: John Nilsson

John Nilsson — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:43:11 +0000

Clay,

Thanks for the info. Do the JWs have formal theological training for their leaders like the Catholics or are they more like the Mormons in this regard? Also, are their leaders paid (as our General Authorities and mission presidents are) or are they expected to maintain their day jobs as well?

By: Clay Whipkey

Clay Whipkey — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:40:44 +0000

John #15,
Maybe that is because Jews and Catholics, for the most part, let people go in peace. Judaism is very personal religion so that makes sense. I’m sure with Catholics there are exceptions with more zealous families.

But with Mormons and JWs, the religion demands so much from you, and makes such heavy claims about itself and outsiders, it becomes very polarizing. When a religion gets that deep into your life and worldview, folks who come to the opinion that the lifestyle and worldview is destructive will be tempted to attack it. Some of that comes intentions to save the believers from themselves, and some of it comes from an effort to reassure themselves they are now the ones who are better than the other. Human nature, right? We validate ourselves by invalidating those different from us.

By: John Hamer

John Hamer — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:18:58 +0000

Clay: Another interesting similarity is the existence of a very active Ex-JW community. Although there are both ExMos and ExJWs, you don’t hear a lot about ExJews and ExCatholics.

I have a good friend who is an active leader on an ExJW internet bboard.

By: Bruce Nielson

Bruce Nielson — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:01:41 +0000

>>> 19th century Mormons usually viewed God the Father as Jehovah

You are only partially correct. 19th centure Mormons usually viewed Jehovah (“The Self Existent One” or “He Is”) as a title synonmous with God and thus could be the Father or Son. This usuage started to die out after the Temple ceremony began to identify Jesus with Jehovah, but it continued to be used as both a title synonmous with God (and thus could apply to the Father) and also like a personal name for Jesus.

The Bible and the D&C both use “Jehovah” as titles for God. The Mormon usage as applying for Jesus as a personal name is based outside of scripture and is founded in the Temple ceremony as far as I know. Well, that’s not entirely true. It’s also founded on the principle of Jesus, as Jehovah, being the being that spoke to Moses and other OT prophets. (That idea is backed up by the New Testament in several places.) I did not know it was tied to Jesus the Christ by Talmage, but this may have popularized it.

Barry Bickmore covers this topic in depth. I can’t find the paper I read about this, but this one partiall covers it: http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/pdf.php?filename=NDczNTU5MTY4LTEyLTEucGRm&type=cmV2aWV3

Update: found the article – http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/pdf.php?filename=MzU4NzQyMDUyLTE1LTEucGRm&type=cmV2aWV3

I might be wrong about it coming from the Temple ceremony, as reviewing it, he doesn’t mention that. But I’m pretty sure that was the place the usage started. He mentions it became very popular after 1916. Was that when Jesus the Christ came out? But it’s never been an all or nothing usage. Sometimes “Jehovah” is used as a title for “God” and other times it’s used as a peronal name for Jesus. Bickmore documents examples of both before and after 1916.

By: Matt Thurston

Matt Thurston — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:57:23 +0000

I had a work friend recently come “out of the closet” and tell me he was a JW after learning I was a Mormon. He was very hush hush about it, asking me not to tell our co-workers. We had a good laugh comparing our mutual growing pains in an outside-the-mainstream religion: our unique idiosyncratic beliefs and practices; our common fear or suspicion of others/sin; our overprotective parents; our fear of ostracism from community/family for believing differently, etc. Now, he seemed to be more of a Cultural JW or New Order JW, if such a classification exists.

Though the “what” we believed was different, the “way” we believed, and the role the faith tradition played in our lives both then and now, was remarkably similar. Change the vernacular and I could have been talking to a Mormon.

By: Brent Hartman

Brent Hartman — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:33:06 +0000

19th century Mormons usually viewed God the Father as Jehovah. For instance, here’s a hymn by John Taylor:

“As in the heavens they all agree,
The record’s given there by Three,
On earth three witnesses are given,
To lead the sons of earth to heaven.

Jehovah, God the Father, is one;
Another, God’s eternal Son;
The Spirit does with them agree -
The witnesses in heaven are three.”
(Sacred Hymns, 1891, p. 295)

You can also see this in older versions of the Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith. Look of “God” in the index, and you will find “(Jehovah)” afterwards. These listings are for God the Father. If you look up “Jehovah” it will say, “See also God”, not Jesus Christ.

In “The Women of Mormondom”, a book that Brigham Young sent out to teach the world about Mormonism, you’ll read the following:

“Mark this august wonder of the age; the Mormons build
not temples to the name of Jesus, but to the name of
Jehovah – not to the Son, but to the Father. . . .
Temples to the Most High God! The scepter, not the
cross!” (The Women of Mormondom, p. 79, Eliza R. Snow
with Edward Tullidge, New York 1877)

The new doctrine of Jesus being Jehovah didn’t really take hold until “Jesus the Christ” by James Talmage.

By: Clay Whipkey

Clay Whipkey — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:56:08 +0000

“I understand JW’s as teaching that “the lesser clan” will be physically resurrected but that they will live on a paradisical earth instead of being redeemed and going back to heaven like 144,000.”

Yes, that’s right. See the link in comment #6 for details on that one.

By: Clay Whipkey

Clay Whipkey — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:55:17 +0000

Hey folks, apparently the JW official website in links trips the spam sensor. See, zealous missionaries, everyone ios called to the work.

If you include a link in your comment, it may go into spam, so be patient until someone rescues it.