<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confessions of a Coffee Heathen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/</link>
	<description>A weekly podcast exploring Mormon culture and current events.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 20:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lemonade  diet</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-112918</link>
		<dc:creator>lemonade  diet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-112918</guid>
		<description>I suffered from stomach pain and burning mostly, couldn&#039;t sleep well and just hated those extra pounds I couldn&#039;t get rid of no matter what I did. Now I stumbled upon this system that is easy and it doesn&#039;t require expensive medication or difficult exercises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suffered from stomach pain and burning mostly, couldn&#8217;t sleep well and just hated those extra pounds I couldn&#8217;t get rid of no matter what I did. Now I stumbled upon this system that is easy and it doesn&#8217;t require expensive medication or difficult exercises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mormon.mom</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-38528</link>
		<dc:creator>mormon.mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-38528</guid>
		<description>I dunno. maybe i just simplifly things waaayyy to much. The Lord revealed to His Church not to drink &quot;hot drinks&quot; and we were given the explanation that this meant no coffee, no tea. We were also told no drugs, smoking and no alcohol. It just seems pretty easy to understand. i mean, i can picture Jesus standing there and saying to us &quot;What part of &quot;no&quot; did you NOT understand&quot; !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno. maybe i just simplifly things waaayyy to much. The Lord revealed to His Church not to drink &#8220;hot drinks&#8221; and we were given the explanation that this meant no coffee, no tea. We were also told no drugs, smoking and no alcohol. It just seems pretty easy to understand. i mean, i can picture Jesus standing there and saying to us &#8220;What part of &#8220;no&#8221; did you NOT understand&#8221; !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris B.</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-30974</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 17:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-30974</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know exactly what the church&#039;s problem on this subject is. I find it, personally, very confusing and tough for the church to make the position it does on the subject. I&#039;ve had my temple reccomend taken away in the past for having consumed *one* coffee at Starbucks. On the other hand, the bishop doesn&#039;t mind if I consume several energy drinks or sodas as soon as I get home from church. Is this really a health issue? I don&#039;t think so. I think this is the church trying to stick to some doctrine that was written (and loosely followed) two hundred years ago. If they honestly think it&#039;s okay to let the members go to the temple with worse things in their system than a cup of coffee, then they are out of whack in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know exactly what the church&#8217;s problem on this subject is. I find it, personally, very confusing and tough for the church to make the position it does on the subject. I&#8217;ve had my temple reccomend taken away in the past for having consumed *one* coffee at Starbucks. On the other hand, the bishop doesn&#8217;t mind if I consume several energy drinks or sodas as soon as I get home from church. Is this really a health issue? I don&#8217;t think so. I think this is the church trying to stick to some doctrine that was written (and loosely followed) two hundred years ago. If they honestly think it&#8217;s okay to let the members go to the temple with worse things in their system than a cup of coffee, then they are out of whack in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valoel</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-28822</link>
		<dc:creator>Valoel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-28822</guid>
		<description>#62  I really contemplate my decisions, especially when I know they are not in line with the normal decisions of fellow Church members and the traditional counsel of leaders.  I&#039;m not looking for people from the internet to make my decision for me really.  I do however appreciate hearing what other people think about challenging topics.  I learn a lot from people who disagree and see things different.  I already know a lot about my own view :-)

The post was a self-reflective question.  I wanted to open up my self-reflection and share it with others who care to ponder and give input.

Thanks everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#62  I really contemplate my decisions, especially when I know they are not in line with the normal decisions of fellow Church members and the traditional counsel of leaders.  I&#8217;m not looking for people from the internet to make my decision for me really.  I do however appreciate hearing what other people think about challenging topics.  I learn a lot from people who disagree and see things different.  I already know a lot about my own view <img src='http://mormonmatters.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The post was a self-reflective question.  I wanted to open up my self-reflection and share it with others who care to ponder and give input.</p>
<p>Thanks everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJM</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26856</link>
		<dc:creator>TJM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26856</guid>
		<description>Coffee is great!!!  Whether or not it has any negative side effects has to do with the amount consumed and whether your body metabolizes caffeine slowly or quickly. The positive side effects are obvious.

I will always choose the coffee bean in favor of aspartame, phenylalanine, saccharin, etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coffee is great!!!  Whether or not it has any negative side effects has to do with the amount consumed and whether your body metabolizes caffeine slowly or quickly. The positive side effects are obvious.</p>
<p>I will always choose the coffee bean in favor of aspartame, phenylalanine, saccharin, etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26550</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 04:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26550</guid>
		<description>Based on the language in the post, my question is does the author care more about driving traffic on his post and getting comments than on making healthy choices or obedience (no matter how you judge his current choice) or getting any sort of feedback that will influence his decision.  I do not presume to know but I think it is a valid self-reflective question for the author and all of us who have taken the time to participate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the language in the post, my question is does the author care more about driving traffic on his post and getting comments than on making healthy choices or obedience (no matter how you judge his current choice) or getting any sort of feedback that will influence his decision.  I do not presume to know but I think it is a valid self-reflective question for the author and all of us who have taken the time to participate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustforQuix</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26328</link>
		<dc:creator>JustforQuix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26328</guid>
		<description>Matt (58): This is a tangent, to be sure, but based on your response I&#039;m puzzled. Maybe you don&#039;t esteem the cost/benefit conclusion on coffee, wine, tea, etc. differently than me. (I thought you were saying that coffee doesn&#039;t add up in analysis to be a positive, or at least reasonable, consumption outside the cultural obedience issue.)  So are you saying you think the social aspect of these substances is a benefit or detriment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt (58): This is a tangent, to be sure, but based on your response I&#8217;m puzzled. Maybe you don&#8217;t esteem the cost/benefit conclusion on coffee, wine, tea, etc. differently than me. (I thought you were saying that coffee doesn&#8217;t add up in analysis to be a positive, or at least reasonable, consumption outside the cultural obedience issue.)  So are you saying you think the social aspect of these substances is a benefit or detriment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26135</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26135</guid>
		<description>I understand and respect that, Matt, but I feel differently when the industries are based on &quot;external&quot; chemical addictions and the major players in those industries understand that fact.  I guess we just have a different perspective on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand and respect that, Matt, but I feel differently when the industries are based on &#8220;external&#8221; chemical addictions and the major players in those industries understand that fact.  I guess we just have a different perspective on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Thurston</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26133</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thurston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26133</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree that the &quot;conspiring men&quot; label applies to the illegal drug and prostitution industries.  And &quot;conspiring men&quot; exist in all industries of course, including many Mormon multi-level marketing industries.  But in general, I have a hard time applying the label &quot;whole cloth&quot; to any one industry, if it is legal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree that the &#8220;conspiring men&#8221; label applies to the illegal drug and prostitution industries.  And &#8220;conspiring men&#8221; exist in all industries of course, including many Mormon multi-level marketing industries.  But in general, I have a hard time applying the label &#8220;whole cloth&#8221; to any one industry, if it is legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Thurston</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26132</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thurston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26132</guid>
		<description>JFQ said, &quot;...though I don’t esteem the cost/benefit conclusion on coffee the same.&quot;

Well, I was just considering the health ramifications, (of which there are multiple schools of thought).  But I think there are other valid variables, besides &quot;health,&quot; to consider.  Variables which impact hte cost/benefit conclusion.  

We don&#039;t eat and drink for purely health reasons.  We eat and drink for social reasons as well, and while I&#039;m sure to be poo-poo&#039;d by everyone here, there are some real social benefits to coffee, tea, and alcohol.  There is a reason certain early LDS leaders &quot;hearts were made merry by the fruit of the vine.&quot;  Did it not create a role in fostering bonhomie amongst the early Saints.  And I&#039;ve heard more than one reputable Mormon Historian speculate that both the Kirtland &quot;pentacostal&quot; experience, and the all-night Nauvoo Temple endowment parties prior to setting off across the plains, were aided and abetted by &quot;the fruit of the vine.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JFQ said, &#8220;&#8230;though I don’t esteem the cost/benefit conclusion on coffee the same.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I was just considering the health ramifications, (of which there are multiple schools of thought).  But I think there are other valid variables, besides &#8220;health,&#8221; to consider.  Variables which impact hte cost/benefit conclusion.  </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t eat and drink for purely health reasons.  We eat and drink for social reasons as well, and while I&#8217;m sure to be poo-poo&#8217;d by everyone here, there are some real social benefits to coffee, tea, and alcohol.  There is a reason certain early LDS leaders &#8220;hearts were made merry by the fruit of the vine.&#8221;  Did it not create a role in fostering bonhomie amongst the early Saints.  And I&#8217;ve heard more than one reputable Mormon Historian speculate that both the Kirtland &#8220;pentacostal&#8221; experience, and the all-night Nauvoo Temple endowment parties prior to setting off across the plains, were aided and abetted by &#8220;the fruit of the vine.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26131</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26131</guid>
		<description>&quot;Finally, too many people accuse church leaders of being “conspiring men”. Seems the label depends on your point of view.&quot;  

Can&#039;t argue with that.  

I agree that the term &quot;conspiring men&quot; doesn&#039;t apply to every addiction peddler, but I have no qualms about saying it applies to the addiction industries - and I think it applies to FAR more people in FAR more industries than are specified in the WofW and than most members realize.  It&#039;s another aspect of &quot;govern themselves&quot;, imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Finally, too many people accuse church leaders of being “conspiring men”. Seems the label depends on your point of view.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t argue with that.  </p>
<p>I agree that the term &#8220;conspiring men&#8221; doesn&#8217;t apply to every addiction peddler, but I have no qualms about saying it applies to the addiction industries &#8211; and I think it applies to FAR more people in FAR more industries than are specified in the WofW and than most members realize.  It&#8217;s another aspect of &#8220;govern themselves&#8221;, imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Thurston</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26130</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thurston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26130</guid>
		<description>Ray #50 said, &lt;em&gt;&quot;The &#039;correct principle&#039; is avoidance of addictive substances that conspiring men promote simply out of greed.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;  

I see what you are saying, but it seems a lot of drinks and/or foods besides Coffee, Tea, Tobacco, and Alcohol could fall under the &quot;conspiring men&quot; label.  

Also, I feel uncomfortable with the &quot;conspiring men... for greed&quot; label anyway.  Many LDS no doubt work for large conglomerates that have a hand in these industries (and other industries like gambling).  I don&#039;t consider Howard Schultz and the rest of the Starbucks brass &quot;conspiring men,&quot; but business men and women providing a product, a service, and careers for people... for a profit, not for greed.  They are also big players when it comes to humanitarian work and philanthropy.  In some respects, they are a model company.  

Finally, too many people accuse church leaders of being &quot;conspiring men&quot;.  Seems the label depends on your point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray #50 said, <em>&#8220;The &#8216;correct principle&#8217; is avoidance of addictive substances that conspiring men promote simply out of greed.&#8221;</em>  </p>
<p>I see what you are saying, but it seems a lot of drinks and/or foods besides Coffee, Tea, Tobacco, and Alcohol could fall under the &#8220;conspiring men&#8221; label.  </p>
<p>Also, I feel uncomfortable with the &#8220;conspiring men&#8230; for greed&#8221; label anyway.  Many LDS no doubt work for large conglomerates that have a hand in these industries (and other industries like gambling).  I don&#8217;t consider Howard Schultz and the rest of the Starbucks brass &#8220;conspiring men,&#8221; but business men and women providing a product, a service, and careers for people&#8230; for a profit, not for greed.  They are also big players when it comes to humanitarian work and philanthropy.  In some respects, they are a model company.  </p>
<p>Finally, too many people accuse church leaders of being &#8220;conspiring men&#8221;.  Seems the label depends on your point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26115</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26115</guid>
		<description>&quot;BTW, mugicha (dried wheat tea for those reading) is nasty stuff. Ash tray in a cup.&quot;  

AMEN!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BTW, mugicha (dried wheat tea for those reading) is nasty stuff. Ash tray in a cup.&#8221;  </p>
<p>AMEN!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Spector</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26099</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Spector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26099</guid>
		<description>JFQ,

Apparently, you missed my point. I wasn&#039;t arguing the fullfillment of the Law with Jesus. I was talking about obedience to the Law. Jews obey the dietary laws because God asked them too, not because of any health reasons. Just as we Latter-day Saints, do.  We do it because we beleive God wants us to. There is no community/tribe or whatever you want to call it standard. It is, in our view the Lord&#039;s standard. I know you know that.

anyway, what is the kick that you and a few others are getting into with community and/or tribe. I know you are part of another Church but the fact is, the LDS community has been created because the gospel of Jesus Christ having been restored in its fullness to the earth. Not the other way around.

while there many be some traditions of men present in the church community, it is the gospel and The Savior that governs it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JFQ,</p>
<p>Apparently, you missed my point. I wasn&#8217;t arguing the fullfillment of the Law with Jesus. I was talking about obedience to the Law. Jews obey the dietary laws because God asked them too, not because of any health reasons. Just as we Latter-day Saints, do.  We do it because we beleive God wants us to. There is no community/tribe or whatever you want to call it standard. It is, in our view the Lord&#8217;s standard. I know you know that.</p>
<p>anyway, what is the kick that you and a few others are getting into with community and/or tribe. I know you are part of another Church but the fact is, the LDS community has been created because the gospel of Jesus Christ having been restored in its fullness to the earth. Not the other way around.</p>
<p>while there many be some traditions of men present in the church community, it is the gospel and The Savior that governs it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustforQuix</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26088</link>
		<dc:creator>JustforQuix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26088</guid>
		<description>Jeff (51): **Gently ribbing** Yep, the WoW is functionally &lt;i&gt;exactly &lt;/i&gt; like the Law of Moses. Most of Christianity, by way of the New Testament, sees the Levitical Laws of Moses as having been fulfilled in Jesus, ushering in the age of greater liberty (and condemnation, see Matt&#039;s point 2 and 3) as well as direct access of humankind before God. So what&#039;s an LDS member to do who agrees with same? The &quot;blessing for that obedience&quot; at stake is acceptance by one&#039;s community more so that a blessing of God per se. It&#039;s a blessing, to be sure, &lt;i&gt;if&lt;/i&gt; that community helps you authentically pursue God and a life in Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff (51): **Gently ribbing** Yep, the WoW is functionally <i>exactly </i> like the Law of Moses. Most of Christianity, by way of the New Testament, sees the Levitical Laws of Moses as having been fulfilled in Jesus, ushering in the age of greater liberty (and condemnation, see Matt&#8217;s point 2 and 3) as well as direct access of humankind before God. So what&#8217;s an LDS member to do who agrees with same? The &#8220;blessing for that obedience&#8221; at stake is acceptance by one&#8217;s community more so that a blessing of God per se. It&#8217;s a blessing, to be sure, <i>if</i> that community helps you authentically pursue God and a life in Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustforQuix</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26087</link>
		<dc:creator>JustforQuix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26087</guid>
		<description>Ray, actually I do agree with you, but I &lt;i&gt;do so&lt;/i&gt; seeing many LDS distinctives, like WoW, as matters of community holiness. So when the church excludes an (honest) coffee or tea drinker from temple participation it is not keeping that person away from salvation in God. But for the excluded member who &lt;i&gt;thinks&lt;/i&gt; they are separated from God more so than their community, then it beckons to Matt&#039;s point #4, and I don&#039;t happen to see the correct principles and libertarian governance you do.

BTW, mugicha (dried wheat tea for those reading) is nasty stuff. Ash tray in a cup. :-) If you like it, shouldn&#039;t be too hard to steer you into pleasure even for a proper (and decaffeinated, if it&#039;s your thing) bitter drink. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, actually I do agree with you, but I <i>do so</i> seeing many LDS distinctives, like WoW, as matters of community holiness. So when the church excludes an (honest) coffee or tea drinker from temple participation it is not keeping that person away from salvation in God. But for the excluded member who <i>thinks</i> they are separated from God more so than their community, then it beckons to Matt&#8217;s point #4, and I don&#8217;t happen to see the correct principles and libertarian governance you do.</p>
<p>BTW, mugicha (dried wheat tea for those reading) is nasty stuff. Ash tray in a cup. <img src='http://mormonmatters.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  If you like it, shouldn&#8217;t be too hard to steer you into pleasure even for a proper (and decaffeinated, if it&#8217;s your thing) bitter drink. <img src='http://mormonmatters.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Spector</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26086</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Spector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26086</guid>
		<description>It seems simple to me. Hot drinks have been interpreted as Coffee and Tea. So, drinking coffee, black or green tea is a violation of the WoW. If one is not interested in a temple recommend, then they can do what they want.

For me, just like the law of Moses, it is ONLY a question of obedience. Any other reason or benefit we receive is a blessing for that obedience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems simple to me. Hot drinks have been interpreted as Coffee and Tea. So, drinking coffee, black or green tea is a violation of the WoW. If one is not interested in a temple recommend, then they can do what they want.</p>
<p>For me, just like the law of Moses, it is ONLY a question of obedience. Any other reason or benefit we receive is a blessing for that obedience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26081</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26081</guid>
		<description>Ironically, Matt and JfQ, I see the current stance on the WofW precisely as the Church employing a &quot;teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves&quot; standard.  

The &quot;correct principle&quot; is avoidance of addictive substances that conspiring men promote simply out of greed.  Those are pretty much the only things that come up in the temple recommend and baptism interviews - not meat or grain or exercise or sleep or anything else.  Those things are left up to us to &quot;govern ourselves&quot;.  

I really think if more people realized that it would cause a little needed understanding on this issue - even if they still disagreed about the inclusion of tea.  Frankly, however, enough teas are allowed around the world (like wheat tea in Japan) that even that could be grouped in the &quot;govern themselves&quot; category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, Matt and JfQ, I see the current stance on the WofW precisely as the Church employing a &#8220;teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves&#8221; standard.  </p>
<p>The &#8220;correct principle&#8221; is avoidance of addictive substances that conspiring men promote simply out of greed.  Those are pretty much the only things that come up in the temple recommend and baptism interviews &#8211; not meat or grain or exercise or sleep or anything else.  Those things are left up to us to &#8220;govern ourselves&#8221;.  </p>
<p>I really think if more people realized that it would cause a little needed understanding on this issue &#8211; even if they still disagreed about the inclusion of tea.  Frankly, however, enough teas are allowed around the world (like wheat tea in Japan) that even that could be grouped in the &#8220;govern themselves&#8221; category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustforQuix</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-26074</link>
		<dc:creator>JustforQuix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-26074</guid>
		<description>I really like how you put that together Matt. Exactly how I feel, though I don&#039;t esteem the cost/benefit conclusion on coffee the same. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like how you put that together Matt. Exactly how I feel, though I don&#8217;t esteem the cost/benefit conclusion on coffee the same. <img src='http://mormonmatters.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Thurston</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-25957</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Thurston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-25957</guid>
		<description>There are two issues here, the &quot;health&quot; issue and the &quot;obedience&quot; issue.  Though the church likes to talk a lot about the former issue, I think the latter issue is the &lt;em&gt;real&lt;/em&gt; issue.  If health were the primary concern, then dozens of other substances would be listed, to say nothing of other health requirements.  But this is more of a test of faith/obedience, more about loyalty to the church, more about appearances and cultural identifiers than we like to admit.

I won&#039;t argue the &quot;Health&quot; issue.  To me, it is fairly cut and dry.  Though drinking coffee may have some minor health benefits, from a pure cost/benefit analysis we&#039;d be way better off &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; drinking coffee.

&quot;Obedience&quot; is a thorny issue for me, I&#039;ll admit.  I have many concerns:

1.)  I&#039;m a firm believer that the &lt;strong&gt;&quot;teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; model is more effective at teaching us the underlying eternal principle than the &lt;strong&gt;&quot;strict obedience&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; model.

2.)  Obedience to specific things creates loopholes whereby people essentially commit the same infraction, without the guilt.  It creats a false sense of &quot;all is well in Zion.&quot;  For example, what principle is learned by those who abstain from coffee, but drink 88 ounces of Diet Coke or Monster every day?  All one has demonstrated is an ability to obey the letter of the law, to find the loophole.  So you take your caffeine cold and bubbly instead of hot with cream and sugar.  Go ahead and compare the caffeine content between Diet Code and Coffee, but if you do, you are simply proving, not refuting, my point.

3.)  Obedience creates the strong temptation for pharasaical judgement of those who don&#039;t comply, or comply differently than the orthodox party line.  I saw Brother Valoel at Starbucks!  I saw Brother Thurston in line for an R-rated movie!  I saw Sister Jones wearing a two-piece bikini!  There is a reason the Pharasees and Saducees could not see the obvious truth in front of them -- they were so blinded by their rules, their degrees, their clothing, their symbols and ceremonies.  We make the same mistake ALL the time.

4.)  Following a rule as a demonstration of one&#039;s fidelity to an institution or person feels too much like idolatry.  It esteems status and standing in the institution above personal conscience and integrity.  And it creates those annoying little sayings like, &quot;Are you going to let something as small as Coffee keep you out of Heaven?&quot;  Please.

So I have trouble with obedience to commandments when I see the hand of man, not the hand of God as I understand God.  To me, the Word of Wisdom combines both elements of God/Divine and Man.  The only way for it to make sense to me is to unpackage the two, and endeavor to follow the part I believe is Divine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two issues here, the &#8220;health&#8221; issue and the &#8220;obedience&#8221; issue.  Though the church likes to talk a lot about the former issue, I think the latter issue is the <em>real</em> issue.  If health were the primary concern, then dozens of other substances would be listed, to say nothing of other health requirements.  But this is more of a test of faith/obedience, more about loyalty to the church, more about appearances and cultural identifiers than we like to admit.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t argue the &#8220;Health&#8221; issue.  To me, it is fairly cut and dry.  Though drinking coffee may have some minor health benefits, from a pure cost/benefit analysis we&#8217;d be way better off <em>not</em> drinking coffee.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obedience&#8221; is a thorny issue for me, I&#8217;ll admit.  I have many concerns:</p>
<p>1.)  I&#8217;m a firm believer that the <strong>&#8220;teach them correct principles and let them govern themselves&#8221;</strong> model is more effective at teaching us the underlying eternal principle than the <strong>&#8220;strict obedience&#8221;</strong> model.</p>
<p>2.)  Obedience to specific things creates loopholes whereby people essentially commit the same infraction, without the guilt.  It creats a false sense of &#8220;all is well in Zion.&#8221;  For example, what principle is learned by those who abstain from coffee, but drink 88 ounces of Diet Coke or Monster every day?  All one has demonstrated is an ability to obey the letter of the law, to find the loophole.  So you take your caffeine cold and bubbly instead of hot with cream and sugar.  Go ahead and compare the caffeine content between Diet Code and Coffee, but if you do, you are simply proving, not refuting, my point.</p>
<p>3.)  Obedience creates the strong temptation for pharasaical judgement of those who don&#8217;t comply, or comply differently than the orthodox party line.  I saw Brother Valoel at Starbucks!  I saw Brother Thurston in line for an R-rated movie!  I saw Sister Jones wearing a two-piece bikini!  There is a reason the Pharasees and Saducees could not see the obvious truth in front of them &#8212; they were so blinded by their rules, their degrees, their clothing, their symbols and ceremonies.  We make the same mistake ALL the time.</p>
<p>4.)  Following a rule as a demonstration of one&#8217;s fidelity to an institution or person feels too much like idolatry.  It esteems status and standing in the institution above personal conscience and integrity.  And it creates those annoying little sayings like, &#8220;Are you going to let something as small as Coffee keep you out of Heaven?&#8221;  Please.</p>
<p>So I have trouble with obedience to commandments when I see the hand of man, not the hand of God as I understand God.  To me, the Word of Wisdom combines both elements of God/Divine and Man.  The only way for it to make sense to me is to unpackage the two, and endeavor to follow the part I believe is Divine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seldom</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-25947</link>
		<dc:creator>Seldom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-25947</guid>
		<description>Instead of the current prohibition against coffee, tea, alcohol, and tobacco, I propose a performance based word of wisdom faithfulness test.  It could be modeled (through insiration) after the miltary physical test.  The physical test would require something like a 2 mile run without feeling weary, and a 5 mile walk without fainting.  Pushup could be used to determine &quot;the weak and weakest of all saints who are or can be called saints.&quot;  Any deaths during the testing could be used as conclusive proof that &quot;the destroying angel did not pass them.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of the current prohibition against coffee, tea, alcohol, and tobacco, I propose a performance based word of wisdom faithfulness test.  It could be modeled (through insiration) after the miltary physical test.  The physical test would require something like a 2 mile run without feeling weary, and a 5 mile walk without fainting.  Pushup could be used to determine &#8220;the weak and weakest of all saints who are or can be called saints.&#8221;  Any deaths during the testing could be used as conclusive proof that &#8220;the destroying angel did not pass them.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustforQuix</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-25926</link>
		<dc:creator>JustforQuix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-25926</guid>
		<description>I think Carl (45) is on the right track. However, I think it&#039;s not fully nuanced, as he, and others, have said that obedience to the WoW is obedience to God. End of discussion.

I see it as obedience to God by way of obedience to one&#039;s faith community, one&#039;s tribe. Other disciples of Christ and their tribes can be quite right by God, and quite healthy, if the New Testament is trustworthy, and not observe the WoW. However, one can&#039;t be quite right by the LDS community and not be outwardly obedient to it. May not be reasonable. May not be logical nor consistent. May not always be scientifically healthful or causatively linked. And, undoubtedly, observance to it will continue to liberalize (or not) in ways that will exasperate those who enjoy consistency from &quot;God.&quot; 

The WoW is a way to show one&#039;s outward loyalty to one&#039;s tribe, if one&#039;s tribe is LDS. All faith tribes have their rules of conformity, of holiness, no matter how much individual liberty they do or don&#039;t embrace. If one&#039;s tribe one wants to be a part of is being an active, temple-going Mormon, then one, by obedience to the WoW, is placing one&#039;s community identity over one&#039;s individual needs, and that, it would seem to be, is always a great and appropriate way to serve God. The prescriptions and proscriptions to the LDS version of &quot;belonging&quot; and &quot;obedience to God&quot; by way of the WoW are just that. But they are more than just that. 

It&#039;s a rewarding pursuit to finding what tribe you most authentically belong to, and want to belong to, and then living authentically to that. It&#039;s an enigmatic yet exciting pursuit to finding out what pleases God and what please one&#039;s tribe. Somethimes they are the same. Sometimes not. And sometimes they intermingle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Carl (45) is on the right track. However, I think it&#8217;s not fully nuanced, as he, and others, have said that obedience to the WoW is obedience to God. End of discussion.</p>
<p>I see it as obedience to God by way of obedience to one&#8217;s faith community, one&#8217;s tribe. Other disciples of Christ and their tribes can be quite right by God, and quite healthy, if the New Testament is trustworthy, and not observe the WoW. However, one can&#8217;t be quite right by the LDS community and not be outwardly obedient to it. May not be reasonable. May not be logical nor consistent. May not always be scientifically healthful or causatively linked. And, undoubtedly, observance to it will continue to liberalize (or not) in ways that will exasperate those who enjoy consistency from &#8220;God.&#8221; </p>
<p>The WoW is a way to show one&#8217;s outward loyalty to one&#8217;s tribe, if one&#8217;s tribe is LDS. All faith tribes have their rules of conformity, of holiness, no matter how much individual liberty they do or don&#8217;t embrace. If one&#8217;s tribe one wants to be a part of is being an active, temple-going Mormon, then one, by obedience to the WoW, is placing one&#8217;s community identity over one&#8217;s individual needs, and that, it would seem to be, is always a great and appropriate way to serve God. The prescriptions and proscriptions to the LDS version of &#8220;belonging&#8221; and &#8220;obedience to God&#8221; by way of the WoW are just that. But they are more than just that. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a rewarding pursuit to finding what tribe you most authentically belong to, and want to belong to, and then living authentically to that. It&#8217;s an enigmatic yet exciting pursuit to finding out what pleases God and what please one&#8217;s tribe. Somethimes they are the same. Sometimes not. And sometimes they intermingle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Youngblood</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-25897</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Youngblood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-25897</guid>
		<description>Valoel, your post implies that the WoW is just a health code.  Problem is, there are plenty of bad substances that are not forbidden by it, and plenty of good substances that are not prescribed.  If viewed in this way, the teaching will always be seen to fall short, and it will never be justifiable.  On the other hand, if you make it a matter of religious observance, just as Jewish and Muslim food rules, then it begins to make more sense as a covenant of obedience that can&#039;t (and should not) be fully justified because of its supposed health benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valoel, your post implies that the WoW is just a health code.  Problem is, there are plenty of bad substances that are not forbidden by it, and plenty of good substances that are not prescribed.  If viewed in this way, the teaching will always be seen to fall short, and it will never be justifiable.  On the other hand, if you make it a matter of religious observance, just as Jewish and Muslim food rules, then it begins to make more sense as a covenant of obedience that can&#8217;t (and should not) be fully justified because of its supposed health benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-25859</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-25859</guid>
		<description>#43 - Great point.  Whenever a discussion like this gets rolling, I think of washing in a dirty river to cleanse leprosy.  Makes no sense whatsoever, but it worked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#43 &#8211; Great point.  Whenever a discussion like this gets rolling, I think of washing in a dirty river to cleanse leprosy.  Makes no sense whatsoever, but it worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valoel</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2008/07/26/confessions-of-a-coffee-heathen/#comment-25842</link>
		<dc:creator>Valoel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=673#comment-25842</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the comments people have made about obedience.  While I have a hard time with arbitrary obedience rules from men, I acknowledge there is indeed potential spiritual implications for doing something ritualistic (like abstinence from substances) for purely spiritual reasons.

Sure, we can justify at times with health.  God could just as easily say &quot;thou shalt stand on your head for 10 minutes a day, and blessing will abound to you.&quot;  There is actually something, in a spiritual sense, to the Word of Wisdom that trancends mere health benefits.  For those of us old farts that remember the Karate Kid movie, Mr. Miagi (sp?) made his student do stupid menial tasks around the house.  They were indeed stupid and menial.  There was however an unseen (to the student at the time) side benefit that was needed for his teacher to bring him to the next level of actual training in Karate.  He had to do the stupid stuff in order to be ready for the important stuff.

This could very well be mixed into WoW practice.  Religion, ritual and faith do not always make sense in the concrete sense.  They still work though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the comments people have made about obedience.  While I have a hard time with arbitrary obedience rules from men, I acknowledge there is indeed potential spiritual implications for doing something ritualistic (like abstinence from substances) for purely spiritual reasons.</p>
<p>Sure, we can justify at times with health.  God could just as easily say &#8220;thou shalt stand on your head for 10 minutes a day, and blessing will abound to you.&#8221;  There is actually something, in a spiritual sense, to the Word of Wisdom that trancends mere health benefits.  For those of us old farts that remember the Karate Kid movie, Mr. Miagi (sp?) made his student do stupid menial tasks around the house.  They were indeed stupid and menial.  There was however an unseen (to the student at the time) side benefit that was needed for his teacher to bring him to the next level of actual training in Karate.  He had to do the stupid stuff in order to be ready for the important stuff.</p>
<p>This could very well be mixed into WoW practice.  Religion, ritual and faith do not always make sense in the concrete sense.  They still work though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

