<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Mormon Matters &#187; agency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mormonmatters.org/tag/agency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mormonmatters.org</link>
	<description>A weekly podcast exploring Mormon culture and current events.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:28:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<copyright>2006-2007 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>dan.wotherspoon@me.com (Mormon Matters)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>dan.wotherspoon@me.com (Mormon Matters)</webMaster>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:new-feed-url>http://www.mormonmatters.org/rssmm.xml</itunes:new-feed-url>
	<itunes:subtitle>A weekly podcast exploring Mormon current events, pop culture, politics and spirituality</itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>A weekly podcast exploring Mormon current events, pop culture, politics and spirituality</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords>mormon, lds</itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Christianity" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:category text="Religion &#38; Spirituality">
		<itunes:category text="Spirituality" />
	</itunes:category>
	<itunes:author>Mormon Matters</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Mormon Matters</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>dan.wotherspoon@me.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://mormonmatters.org/podcast/MormonMattersLogo2.gif" />
		<item>
		<title>94–95: Suicide</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2012/05/01/94-95-suicide/</link>
		<comments>http://mormonmatters.org/2012/05/01/94-95-suicide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 02:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wotherspoon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guilt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mormon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suicide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=13795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Suicide affects all of us, and involves so many devastating emotions. Grief (as one of the panelists refers to it, a very “complicated” form of grief), guilt (“What did I do wrong?” “I should have seen signs and intervened”), and, often, an element of concern for the deceased’s soul state (“Can they ever be forgiven?” “Were they accountable when they did this?”). In this two-part episode, panelists Natasha Helfer Parker, Charn Burton, and Nicholas Maughn join Mormon Matters host Dan Wotherspoon in an thorough discussion of  suicide—offering education about its primary causes (what to look for if the person has given subtle clues about her or his intentions, how to best serve and be present for loved ones of the person who died, its many ripple effects pertaining to marriages and other relationships, survivor’s own mental health, etc.)—confronting bad information, cultural attitudes, and harmful theology, and suggesting helpful and healing notions about God and the type of universe in which we live. The discussion concerns all aspects of suicide and is conscious of the phenomena as a whole, but in the second part especially speaks directly to particular Mormon teachings—the hopeful ones as well as the ones that deserve being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mormonmatters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Depression.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-13796" title="Depression" src="http://mormonmatters.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Depression.jpg" alt="" width="281" height="180" /></a>Suicide affects all of us, and involves so many devastating emotions. Grief (as one of the panelists refers to it, a very “complicated” form of grief), guilt (“What did I do wrong?” “I should have seen signs and intervened”), and, often, an element of concern for the deceased’s soul state (“Can they ever be forgiven?” “Were they accountable when they did this?”).</p>
<p>In this two-part episode, panelists <strong>Natasha Helfer Parker</strong>, <strong>Charn Burton</strong>, and <strong>Nicholas Maughn</strong> join Mormon Matters host <strong>Dan Wotherspoon</strong> in an thorough discussion of  suicide—offering education about its primary causes (what to look for if the person has given subtle clues about her or his intentions, how to best serve and be present for loved ones of the person who died, its many ripple effects pertaining to marriages and other relationships, survivor’s own mental health, etc.)—confronting bad information, cultural attitudes, and harmful theology, and suggesting helpful and healing notions about God and the type of universe in which we live. The discussion concerns all aspects of suicide and is conscious of the phenomena as a whole, but in the second part especially speaks directly to particular Mormon teachings—the hopeful ones as well as the ones that deserve being confronted and sent into oblivion. This is a very personal episode with powerful things in it for every person.</p>
<p>We look forward to your joining in the conversation below.</p>
<p>______</p>
<p>Links and Helps:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lds.org/ensign/1987/10/suicide-some-things-we-know-and-some-we-do-not?lang=eng&amp;query=suicide">Elder M. Russell Ballard, &#8220;Suicide: Some Things We Know, and Some We Do Not&#8221;</a> (Ensign, October 1987)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mormontherapist/">The Mormon Therapist</a> (Mental Health and Straight Talking about Difficult Subjects blog by panelist Natasha Helfer Parker)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thetrevorproject.org/">The Trevor Project</a> (Crisis and suicide prevention organization especially for LGBTQ youth)</p>
<p><a href="http://suicidehotlines.com/">Suicide Hotlines</a> you can call when you&#8217;re in crisis or are with someone in crisis</p>
<p><a href="http://www.outofthedarkness.org/">Fundraising for Suicide Prevention</a> through community walks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mormonmatters.org/2012/05/01/94-95-suicide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://mormonmatters.org/podcast/MormonMatters-094.mp3" length="44009726" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>1:31:29</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Suicide affects all of us, and involves so many devastating emotions. Grief (as one of the panelists refers to it, a very “complicated” form of grief), guilt (“What did I do wrong?” “I should have seen signs and intervened”), and, often, an element [...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Suicide affects all of us, and involves so many devastating emotions. Grief (as one of the panelists refers to it, a very “complicated” form of grief), guilt (“What did I do wrong?” “I should have seen signs and intervened”), and, often, an element of concern for the deceased’s soul state (“Can they ever be forgiven?” “Were they accountable when they did this?”).
In this two-part episode, panelists Natasha Helfer Parker, Charn Burton, and Nicholas Maughn join Mormon Matters host Dan Wotherspoon in an thorough discussion of  suicide—offering education about its primary causes (what to look for if the person has given subtle clues about her or his intentions, how to best serve and be present for loved ones of the person who died, its many ripple effects pertaining to marriages and other relationships, survivor’s own mental health, etc.)—confronting bad information, cultural attitudes, and harmful theology, and suggesting helpful and healing notions about God and the type of universe in which we live. The discussion concerns all aspects of suicide and is conscious of the phenomena as a whole, but in the second part especially speaks directly to particular Mormon teachings—the hopeful ones as well as the ones that deserve being confronted and sent into oblivion. This is a very personal episode with powerful things in it for every person.
We look forward to your joining in the conversation below.
______
Links and Helps:
Elder M. Russell Ballard, &#8220;Suicide: Some Things We Know, and Some We Do Not&#8221; (Ensign, October 1987)
The Mormon Therapist (Mental Health and Straight Talking about Difficult Subjects blog by panelist Natasha Helfer Parker)
The Trevor Project (Crisis and suicide prevention organization especially for LGBTQ youth)
Suicide Hotlines you can call when you&#8217;re in crisis or are with someone in crisis
Fundraising for Suicide Prevention through community walks</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Mormon Matters</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>58: Obedience and Agency</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2011/11/01/58-obedience-and-agency/</link>
		<comments>http://mormonmatters.org/2011/11/01/58-obedience-and-agency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 23:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Wotherspoon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childlike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commandments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mormon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obedience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prophets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=13428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mormonism teaches the importance of being obedient to God and God’s will while at the same time emphasizing the bedrock fact of our individual agency. The gospel ideal is that we fully and knowingly submit our will to that of God, and in this way be obedient while still acting entirely out of our own agency. Of course, life is much messier than this, and the ideal hides from us a bit. How can we truly know God’s will and when we’re hearing God’s voice and not our own? Because of difficulties like this, one of the most common ways that messages about obedience and agency become complicated comes in the form of exhortations to listen to LDS prophets, apostles, and other leaders who are more practiced in discerning the will of God, and to then &#8220;obey&#8221; their counsel. Before long, the ideal of our growing into our own trust in our own relationship with God fades into the background, and obeying leaders, following gospel programs, performing particular actions move to the forefront. The ideal is always there, but sometimes the message that we are to be growing in confidence in our own relationship with God becomes harder to pick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mormonmatters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Tree-of-Life-Dream.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-13429" title="Tree of Life Dream" src="http://mormonmatters.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Tree-of-Life-Dream-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a>Mormonism teaches the importance of being obedient to God and God’s will while at the same time emphasizing the bedrock fact of our individual agency. The gospel ideal is that we fully and knowingly submit our will to that of God, and in this way be obedient while still acting entirely out of our own agency. Of course, life is much messier than this, and the ideal hides from us a bit. How can we truly know God’s will and when we’re hearing God’s voice and not our own? Because of difficulties like this, one of the most common ways that messages about obedience and agency become complicated comes in the form of exhortations to listen to LDS prophets, apostles, and other leaders who are more practiced in discerning the will of God, and to then &#8220;obey&#8221; their counsel. Before long, the ideal of our growing into our own trust in our own relationship with God fades into the background, and obeying leaders, following gospel programs, performing particular actions move to the forefront. The ideal is always there, but sometimes the message that we are to be growing in confidence in our own relationship with God becomes harder to pick out amid the noise.</p>
<p>In this episode, Mormon Matters host <strong>Dan Wotherspoon</strong> and panelists <strong>Jennifer Finlayson-Fife</strong>, <strong>Chelsea Fife</strong>, and <strong>Michael Fife</strong> discuss these tensions, their possible origins, and the reasons for the ascendance of &#8220;obedience to leaders&#8221; rhetoric and a focus on performing activities that yield more easily measurable results. They also explore the call to deeper discipleship and the understandings and pathways that help keep the ideal of free agents freely submitting to the divine will based upon their own relationship with God. The primary questions underlying the discussion are: What is spiritual maturity? How can we work toward it and come to live joyfully in a church culture that doesn’t always encourage us to grow too far beyond &#8220;I Am a Child of God&#8221;? How do we become &#8220;adults&#8221; of God? How do we remember always that the true call is not to remain children but to mature to the point where we are ready to become brides of Christ, full partners with God, partakers of the eternal life?</p>
<p>After listening, please share your ideas in the comments section below!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mormonmatters.org/2011/11/01/58-obedience-and-agency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
			<enclosure url="http://mormonmatters.org/podcast/MormonMatters-058.mp3" length="55859704" type="audio/mpeg" />
		<itunes:duration>1:56:10</itunes:duration>
		<itunes:subtitle>Mormonism teaches the importance of being obedient to God and God’s will while at the same time emphasizing the bedrock fact of our individual agency. The gospel ideal is that we fully and knowingly submit our will to that of God, and in this way be[...]</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Mormonism teaches the importance of being obedient to God and God’s will while at the same time emphasizing the bedrock fact of our individual agency. The gospel ideal is that we fully and knowingly submit our will to that of God, and in this way be obedient while still acting entirely out of our own agency. Of course, life is much messier than this, and the ideal hides from us a bit. How can we truly know God’s will and when we’re hearing God’s voice and not our own? Because of difficulties like this, one of the most common ways that messages about obedience and agency become complicated comes in the form of exhortations to listen to LDS prophets, apostles, and other leaders who are more practiced in discerning the will of God, and to then &#8220;obey&#8221; their counsel. Before long, the ideal of our growing into our own trust in our own relationship with God fades into the background, and obeying leaders, following gospel programs, performing particular actions move to the forefront. The ideal is always there, but sometimes the message that we are to be growing in confidence in our own relationship with God becomes harder to pick out amid the noise.
In this episode, Mormon Matters host Dan Wotherspoon and panelists Jennifer Finlayson-Fife, Chelsea Fife, and Michael Fife discuss these tensions, their possible origins, and the reasons for the ascendance of &#8220;obedience to leaders&#8221; rhetoric and a focus on performing activities that yield more easily measurable results. They also explore the call to deeper discipleship and the understandings and pathways that help keep the ideal of free agents freely submitting to the divine will based upon their own relationship with God. The primary questions underlying the discussion are: What is spiritual maturity? How can we work toward it and come to live joyfully in a church culture that doesn’t always encourage us to grow too far beyond &#8220;I Am a Child of God&#8221;? How do we become &#8220;adults&#8221; of God? How do we remember always that the true call is not to remain children but to mature to the point where we are ready to become brides of Christ, full partners with God, partakers of the eternal life?
After listening, please share your ideas in the comments section below!</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:keywords>podcast</itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:author>Mormon Matters</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The constraints of agency: Your neighbor and your neighborhood</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2010/07/09/the-constraints-of-agency-your-neighbor-and-your-neighborhood/</link>
		<comments>http://mormonmatters.org/2010/07/09/the-constraints-of-agency-your-neighbor-and-your-neighborhood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AdamF</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proxy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=12013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Albert Bandura defines agency is “the capacity to exercise control over the nature and quality of one’s life.”  We have freedom to make choices, and we are responsible for (the agent of) what we choose. Exactly how responsible are we for our actions? What influences to make decisions? Home life? Community influences? Abuse? Emotionally dismissive parenting? An unfortunate genetic tendency? Are we always (or ever) 100% responsible? Bandura explains how these external forces influence us and our agency: “Personal agency operates within a network of sociostructural inﬂuences. In these agentic transactions, people are producers as well as products of social systems.” He adds that while some psychologists in the past have viewed behavior as being automatically controlled by the environment, a more accurate view combines environmental influence, and “agentic action” in one’s environment. This seems more in line with the gospel. Our environments (and the choices of people around us) make certain values, abilities, or even personal choices more or less likely. For example, I am currently training in a method of family therapy with adolescent and adult offenders (usually at least one family member is on probation) and their families. One of our first major goals with a family [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Bandura" target="_blank">Albert Bandura</a> defines agency is “the capacity to exercise control over the nature and quality of one’s life.”  We have freedom to make choices, and we are responsible for (the agent of) what we choose. Exactly how responsible are we for our actions? What influences to make decisions? Home life? Community influences? Abuse? Emotionally dismissive parenting? An unfortunate genetic tendency? Are we always (or ever) 100% responsible?<span id="more-12013"></span></p>
<p>Bandura explains how these external forces influence us and our agency: “Personal agency operates within a network of sociostructural inﬂuences. In these <em>agentic transactions</em>, people are producers as well as products of social systems.” He adds that while some psychologists in the past have viewed behavior as being automatically controlled by the environment, a more accurate view combines environmental influence, and “agentic action” in one’s environment. This seems more in line with the gospel.</p>
<p>Our environments (and the choices of people around us) make certain values, abilities, or even personal choices more or less likely. For example, I am currently training in a method of family therapy with adolescent and adult offenders (usually at least one family member is on probation) and their families. One of our first major goals with a family is to reduce blame by creating a “family focus” on the problem, rather than assigning blame to individual members (which they’re all SO good at). The relational patterns of interaction in the family make certain behaviors (e.g. punching the principal, or trafficking cocaine) more likely to occur. (As an aside–the therapy works. About half of these adolescents have a huge drop in recidivism. Those who do re-offend usually commit less crimes, which are less severe.)</p>
<p>I have talked many people who seem to use the concept of agency as a way to write other people off. “Well, that kid may have had a hard life, but he is responsible for his actions.” Well, kind of. Yes, we are responsible for our actions, but when we evaluate ourselves and (hopefully not too much) others, we need to be mindful of myriad other factors that are involved.</p>
<p>The “True to the Faith” booklet says: “You are responsible for the decisions you make. You should not blame your circumstances, your family, or your friends if you choose to disobey God’s commandments. You have the ability to choose righteousness and happiness, regardless of your circumstances.” I completely agree – blaming others is not useful. At the same time, I have seen people use this doctrine of not blaming others as a way to blame others. For example, one spouse said about the other (I’m paraphrasing here), “she CHOOSES to be upset and angry and to be afraid and to withdraw from me, so there’s nothing I can do about it.” Of course, she chooses, but he did not realize the powerful influence he was having on her that would make it more likely that she would feel these negative emotions. In other words, when we dismiss others due to their poor choices, we often are blaming them.</p>
<p>Let us not blame others for our actions, and let us not blame others 100% for their actions either. We don’t know what forces have influenced their lives. Many of us also need to stop blaming ourselves for what happens in our lives. In therapy, this is often just as big of a problem as always blaming others.</p>
<p>So, to what extent <em>are</em> we accountable?</p>
<p>“That every many may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment.” – D&amp;C 101</p>
<p>I think our “own sins” refers to our individual agency. We will NOT be accountable for the choices our neighbors, friends, parents, family, or community make. Those choices still affect our agency a great deal though. Bandura refers to the choices of others that have control over our lives as “proxy” agency. Some things that come to mind here are the choices of Adam and Eve, baptism for the dead (by proxy), and choices of our parents, spouses, or even church leaders in some cases. We rely on many people to make things happen for us. We are also responsible to make things happen for others. The Atonement is the best example of proxy agency. We cannot overcome the effects of sin and death. We are not agents in this sense. We have to rely on the agency of a Savior.</p>
<p>The other form is “collective” agency. We rely on the community at large to make certain things happen. For example, I do not have the agency to make my graduation happen all by myself. I am only responsible (read: agentic) for what I have control over. I have to try to get others (e.g. advisors, administrators, etc.) to use their agency in my behalf. The church (or even a ward) as a whole is another example of how collective agency is used. What we achieve as a church is “the product not only of the shared intentions, knowledge, and skills” of the members, “but also of the interactive, coordinated, and synergistic dynamics” of our interactions.</p>
<p>Another observation I had on this topic was that I think many of us give up our agency by shunning responsibility. I have seen some people put everything on God in terms of big choices in their lives, while not using their own intellect in the process. In a sense, by ascribing things 100% to God, one is in a sense blaming (read: attributing responsibility) God for what happens, whether good or bad. I think following leaders blindly without thought and prayer is another way we give up our agency. We have a mind and a heart, and God wants us to use both of them. Don’t confuse trusting God with putting the responsibility on him. Perhaps we do this because it is easier or more comfortable to surrender our responsibility.</p>
<p>In sum, we don&#8217;t have the ability to choose anything, in every situation. Often we must rely on others to exercise their agency in our behalf. That is why the choices we make that affect others are SO important. If one should get married, and when. Deciding if and when to have children. How we parent our children. If and how we help the poor and the needy. Whether or not we indulge in whatever our favorite sin may be.</p>
<p>May we have the courage to be <em>accurate</em> in taking responsibility for our choices, and <em>understanding</em> of others who may not have been dealt the same cards in life that we have.</p>
<p>Reference: Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. <em>Annual Review of 	Psychology, 52,</em> 1-26.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mormonmatters.org/2010/07/09/the-constraints-of-agency-your-neighbor-and-your-neighborhood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Power of Choice</title>
		<link>http://mormonmatters.org/2009/06/18/the-power-of-choice/</link>
		<comments>http://mormonmatters.org/2009/06/18/the-power-of-choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Spector</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plan of salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spiritual progression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mormonmatters.org/?p=5817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most important doctrinal points of the LDS Church is the power of choice, called agency or free agency in the Church.  In many ways, the entire Plan of Salvation hinges on the power of choice. “That every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment.” (D&#38;C 101:78) The entire topic of choice and free will did not originate with the LDS Church. For hundreds of years, philosophers and theologians have contemplated the idea of free will, both in a religious and a natural sense. It is not my intention to discuss these ideas, but if you are interested, you can start at Wikipedia on Free Will and Free Will in Theology . I wish to focus my attention to the LDS concept of agency and how we are affected by its use in our lives. “Man was also in the beginning with God. Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be.  All truth is independent in that sphere in which God has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most important doctrinal points of the LDS Church is the power of choice, called agency or free agency in the Church.  In many ways, the entire Plan of Salvation hinges on the power of choice.</p>
<blockquote><p><span id="more-5817"></span>“That every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining to futurity, according to the moral agency which I have given unto him, that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment.” (D&amp;C 101:78)</p></blockquote>
<p>The entire topic of choice and free will did not originate with the LDS Church. For hundreds of years, philosophers and theologians have contemplated the idea of free will, both in a religious and a natural sense. It is not my intention to discuss these ideas, but if you are interested, you can start at Wikipedia on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will">Free Will </a>and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will_in_theology">Free Will in Theology </a>. I wish to focus my attention to the LDS concept of agency and how we are affected by its use in our lives.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Man was also in the beginning with God. Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created or made, neither indeed can be.  All truth is independent in that sphere in which God has placed it, to act for itself, as all intelligence also; otherwise there is no existence.” (D&amp;C 93:29-30)”</p></blockquote>
<p>We are taught that there was a war in heaven before the world was.  That some chose to follow Satan and were cast out.  Those that chose to follow the plan of Our Heavenly Father and Jesus also chose to come to earth, assume a mortal body, and be subjected to the trials of this earth in the hope we would find the Gospel, live a life of obedience and sacrifice and gain our reward to return to live with them throughout eternity.  This simple lesson is taught in primary and by the missionaries to investigators.  But the power to choose and the possible ramifications of our choices are much more complex and difficult than a simple lesson would indicate.</p>
<p>Every choice we make has consequences associated with it.  And while it is assumed that choices are made between good and evil, sometimes choices have to be made between good and good.</p>
<blockquote><p>“And I, the Lord God, commanded the man, saying: Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat,  But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it, nevertheless, thou mayest choose for thyself, for it is given unto thee; but, remember that I forbid it, for in the day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. “ (Moses 3:16-17)</p></blockquote>
<p>When Adam and Eve were in the Garden of Eden, they were forced to make a choice between two seemingly good things.  That of being obedient to the Father and being fruitful and multiplying, thus creating the mortal human race.  Luckily for us, they choose the later.  But in doing so, they suffered the consequences of their act of obedience by introducing a number of bad things to the world such as death, sin, sickness, suffering, trials, etc.  Many good things also happened like happiness, joy, children, blessings, and the ability to choose.</p>
<p><strong>What can we choose?</strong></p>
<p>There are many basis areas when we have almost complete control of our choices.  We decide which way to go.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Many Life Choices</strong> – Where to live, where to go to school, what kind of career to have, with whom to associate, who we marry (Gay folks notwithstanding for now), whether or not to have children, etc. Those sort of things.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Our Morality </strong>– What kind of person will we be, law abiding, honest, trustworthy, loyal to others. Much of which is driven by:</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Our Religion and Faith </strong>– We can choose whether we will follow a set of religious principles or not.  We can choose which religion we want to belong to or identify with and we can choose to be active in that religion or not.  We can choose to follow the religion of our parents or we can go in a different direction entirely.  We can even choose if we want to believe in God at all or not.  I firmly believe that having faith is a choice reinforced by our experiences, both spiritual and temporal.  On the other hand, I can also see that not having faith or losing faith can be the result of the same thing. But, I think the key idea is the choice.  We can choose to believe in spite of the lack of experiences which reinforce our choice. I know this is hard, but as Paul said,</li>
</ul>
<blockquote><p>“faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen&#8221; (Hebrews 11:1).</p></blockquote>
<p>We can continue to hope those experiences will come.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>How we react </strong>– We can choose how to react to things around us.  In spite of the hand which we are dealt (see below), we can let the things we cannot control, control us, or we can choose to take control of our situation and make it better.  As a child, this is not always possible or we may not have a sufficient maturity level to fully comprehend it. As an adult, we can gain complete control over most of the circumstances and the ill effects of our life.  In some cases, it requires incredibly hard work, sometimes alone or with the help of others, God and our faith, but many people have overcome horrendous circumstances to go on to lead highly productive, happy lives.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>What we can’t choose?</strong></p>
<p>While we have this ability to control our choices for most of our lives, there are a few things we cannot choose or where we lose our ability to choose.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The circumstances of our birth</strong> – As far as we know, we do not or cannot choose who our parents will be, the circumstances of our birth, such as where we are born, whether our parents are rich or born, whether they will be good parents, and whether we get to be brought up in the Gospel or not.  We cannot always control the health or condition of our physical bodies.  We may have chronic problems or physical limitations.  It appears we just have to deal with it one way or another.</li>
</ul>
<p>I’ve always been somewhat bothered by the seeming randomness of it all, whether it is part of God’s plan or just luck, good or bad.  And if it is part of God’s plan, why some people never find the gospel in this life?  Isn’t that what we are supposed to do?  In other words, “Jimmy, you promised!”  But can he really deliver?  I know we are given trials in this life to help us improve, but some folks just seem to get a disproportionate share.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The consequences of our own decisions</strong> – If we have the complete freedom to choose, we do not have the freedom to choose what happens as a result of many of our choices, good and bad.  For example, the economy.  We could have done everything right with regard to preparing for a “rainy day” and still suffer some effects of the bad economy we now face, like losing a job.  We could have mitigated the effects substantially by following the things we are taught at Church, like having a year’s supply, staying out of debt, saving our money, etc.  If we become addicted to drugs, alcohol or other harmful things, we lose the freedom to choose to do it or not do it without a lot of painful effort. If we choose to be dishonest or commit a crime, and get caught, we cannot control our punishment. If we stop following the commandments, turn our back on the church and leave it, we cannot control our eternal consequences. That is, if all we have learned is true. If not, then maybe we will be OK after all.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>The consequences of the decision of others </strong>– If God is truly watching over us, then the actions of others should be mitigated by what God has planned for us personally.  That is, IF that is the case.  But, if God allows the actions of others to affect our lives in spite of “the Plan,” then we are subject to other’s poor choices.  Such as we are driving down the road, minding out own business, following all traffic rules and we are hit and killed by another driver, who is not following the rules. That sort of thing happens every day.  Part of the Plan?  Perhaps so, but we had no choice in the matter.  I suppose we could have chosen to stay home and in bed that day. But, as my grandmother used to say, “Who knew?”</li>
</ul>
<p>There would be some who might say, “well, if you are really in tune with the Holy Ghost, He would warn you that a bad thing might happen and to avoid that spot at that time.”  Yeah, right.  Yes, it could happen, it might happen, but sometimes does not.  Seemingly, good, God-fearing people die all the time under circumstances they did not or could not control.  Part of the Plan?  Maybe.  There are a million other examples I could cite.</p>
<p>As I stated in the beginning, I think choice is among the most important gifts God has given us. We can use it wisely or use it foolishly.  Our happiness on this earth and in the eternities seems to depend on the choices we make.</p>
<p>Do you think choice is that important?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mormonmatters.org/2009/06/18/the-power-of-choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

